public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug nptl/14485] File corruption race condition in robust mutex unlocking
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14485-131-WAy4Aj3cSP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14485-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14485

--- Comment #8 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> ---
In reply to comment 4, this issue can be avoided by applications in at least
two ways:

1. Use a separate mapping of the shared synchronization object for each
user/thread that might want to unmap it.

2. Use a separate synchronization object local to the process to synchronize
unmapping of the shared mutex.

Since the only way you'd have multiple threads in the same process accessing
the shared synchronization object is by storing the pointer to the (mapping
containing the) shared mutex in some process-local object that's shared between
threads, it seems natural that you would already be synchronizing access to
this memory with another mutex (or other synchronization object) stored with
the pointer. So approach 2 seems like it's always practical, probably doesn't
involve any new synchronization, and likely makes it unnecessary/useless to
support self-synchronized unmapping. On the other hand, it may not actually be
any harder to support self-synchronized unmapping than to support
self-synchronized destruction+unmapping, which almost certainly needs to be
supported.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-10  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17 18:52 [Bug nptl/14485] New: " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-08-17 22:34 ` [Bug nptl/14485] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-06-17 18:35 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-06-25 10:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-06-25 15:47 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-02-09  0:28 ` mail at nh2 dot me
2015-02-09 20:41 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2015-02-09 21:13 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2015-02-09 22:51 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-02-10  0:18 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx [this message]
2015-02-10 21:57 ` triegel at redhat dot com
2015-02-10 22:17 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-08-09 12:29 ` mail at nh2 dot me
2021-10-21 15:42 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-14485-131-WAy4Aj3cSP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).