public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/14497] New: declare short functions inline
@ 2012-08-19 10:21 wbrana at gmail dot com
2012-11-16 11:06 ` [Bug libc/14497] " aj at suse dot de
2014-06-17 18:33 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wbrana at gmail dot com @ 2012-08-19 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Bug #: 14497
Summary: declare short functions inline
Product: glibc
Version: 2.16
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: wbrana@gmail.com
CC: drepper.fsp@gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
short functions like fdatasync could be declared inline
int
fdatasync (int fildes)
{
return fsync (fildes);
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/14497] declare short functions inline 2012-08-19 10:21 [Bug libc/14497] New: declare short functions inline wbrana at gmail dot com @ 2012-11-16 11:06 ` aj at suse dot de 2014-06-17 18:33 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-11-16 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14497 Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |aj at suse dot de Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-11-16 11:06:03 UTC --- We do this already for functions where it is possible to do so and makes sense, e.g. for some math functions. Such short functions need both an inline function as well as a real implementation. fdatasync is in no way performance critical and the overhead of duplicating the function does not deserve this extra work. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/14497] declare short functions inline 2012-08-19 10:21 [Bug libc/14497] New: declare short functions inline wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 11:06 ` [Bug libc/14497] " aj at suse dot de @ 2014-06-17 18:33 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-17 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14497 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |security- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-17 18:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-08-19 10:21 [Bug libc/14497] New: declare short functions inline wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 11:06 ` [Bug libc/14497] " aj at suse dot de 2014-06-17 18:33 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).