From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27513 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 11:06:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 27457 invoked by uid 48); 16 Nov 2012 11:06:03 -0000 From: "aj at suse dot de" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug libc/14497] declare short functions inline Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aj at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14497 Andreas Jaeger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |aj at suse dot de Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Andreas Jaeger 2012-11-16 11:06:03 UTC --- We do this already for functions where it is possible to do so and makes sense, e.g. for some math functions. Such short functions need both an inline function as well as a real implementation. fdatasync is in no way performance critical and the overhead of duplicating the function does not deserve this extra work. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.