public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mancha1 at hush dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/14547] strcoll integer / buffer overflow
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14547-131-pVvD3aT33s@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14547-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14547
--- Comment #9 from mancha <mancha1 at hush dot com> ---
(In reply to mancha from comment #8)
> Hello. I applied Siddhesh's three patches (2 CVE fixes + strcoll
> refactoring) and the PoCs no longer trigger overflows.
>
> What is a reasonable runtime to expect on those PoCs post-patch?
>
> I ask because last night I left Joseph's code running on a ~2.3GHz Intel and
> it was still going this morning [was in seq_next_seq_nocache()].
>
> Thanks!
get_next_seq_nocache() that is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-25 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 20:59 [Bug libc/14547] New: " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 21:13 ` [Bug libc/14547] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-06 16:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-06 17:03 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-09-08 3:38 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-09-11 9:53 ` shaun.colley at ioactive dot com
2012-09-11 15:52 ` shaun.colley at ioactive dot com
2013-09-23 6:00 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
2013-10-25 13:10 ` mancha1 at hush dot com
2013-10-25 13:17 ` mancha1 at hush dot com [this message]
2013-10-25 13:30 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
2013-10-25 15:03 ` mancha1 at hush dot com
2014-02-16 19:41 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:41 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-13 10:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-06-13 11:43 ` [Bug libc/14547] strcoll integer / buffer overflow (CVE-2012-4412, CVE-2012-4424) fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-02-24 11:36 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-14547-131-pVvD3aT33s@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).