From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20359 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2013 13:17:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20293 invoked by uid 48); 25 Oct 2013 13:17:48 -0000 From: "mancha1 at hush dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/14547] strcoll integer / buffer overflow Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.16 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mancha1 at hush dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14547 --- Comment #9 from mancha --- (In reply to mancha from comment #8) > Hello. I applied Siddhesh's three patches (2 CVE fixes + strcoll > refactoring) and the PoCs no longer trigger overflows. > > What is a reasonable runtime to expect on those PoCs post-patch? > > I ask because last night I left Joseph's code running on a ~2.3GHz Intel and > it was still going this morning [was in seq_next_seq_nocache()]. > > Thanks! get_next_seq_nocache() that is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.