public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug nptl/14744] kill -32 $pid or kill -33 $pid on a process cancels a random thread
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14744-131-MBDp7NfTZI@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14744-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14744

--- Comment #5 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> ---
Allowing cancellation from other applications is certainly not desirable, any
moreso than it would be desirable for one process to call free() on a pointer
malloc'd by another process. And anyway, pthread_t is only meaningful within
the context of the process it belongs to.

Technically you could use the tgkill syscall directly to intentionally send a
cancellation signal to a particular target thread in another process (this
would be less insane than sending it to the process and having the kernel
randomly deliver it to one thread). Perhaps the original intent of the code was
to allow something like this, where users might attempt to cancel a stuck
thread as a way to get a process going again. This seems like a really bad idea
though (most apps don't use or support cancellation, and cancelling a thread
that's not written to be cancelled could cause dangerous misbehavior). If
someone really wants to go to that kind of extent to try to "fix" a hung
application, gdb is the right tool, and in fact you can use gdb to call
pthread_cancel on a particular thread or make the thread itself call
pthread_exit.

So, I really don't think there's any sense in trying to allow cancelling
threads from outside the process.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-12 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-20  1:36 [Bug nptl/14744] New: " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-10 20:29 ` [Bug nptl/14744] " carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-10 22:07 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2014-01-10 22:43 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-12 18:32 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-12 18:34 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-12 23:25 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx [this message]
2014-01-16 16:47 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-06-14 12:50 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-06-10  1:44 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-14744-131-MBDp7NfTZI@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).