public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
@ 2012-10-26 9:28 siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-11-16 11:20 ` [Bug build/14770] " aj at suse dot de
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: siddhesh at redhat dot com @ 2012-10-26 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Bug #: 14770
Summary: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: build
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: siddhesh@redhat.com
CC: carlos@systemhalted.org
Classification: Unclassified
08f43f9b added optimized versions of memcmp, memset and memcpy, in which the
.machine mnemonic is used. This mnemonic is only supported on binutils >=
2.21.52.0.1 and glibc looks for 2.20 as the minimum version, so configure
incorrectly succeeds and the build fails later.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
@ 2012-11-16 11:20 ` aj at suse dot de
2012-11-20 12:20 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-11-16 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware |krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
|dot org |
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-11-16 11:20:23 UTC ---
Andreas, could check this, please?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-11-16 11:20 ` [Bug build/14770] " aj at suse dot de
@ 2012-11-20 12:20 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2012-11-20 12:24 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2012-11-20 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |krebbel at linux dot
| |vnet.ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> 2012-11-20 12:19:02 UTC ---
We started talking about how we could check whether ld is able to deal with
IFUNC symbols or not:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-07/msg00051.html
Do we want something as proposed there? I'm not quite sure how portable such a
check is.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-11-16 11:20 ` [Bug build/14770] " aj at suse dot de
2012-11-20 12:20 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2012-11-20 12:24 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2013-01-09 16:01 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2012-11-20 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> 2012-11-20 12:23:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 08f43f9b added optimized versions of memcmp, memset and memcpy, in which the
> .machine mnemonic is used. This mnemonic is only supported on binutils >=
> 2.21.52.0.1 and glibc looks for 2.20 as the minimum version, so configure
> incorrectly succeeds and the build fails later.
The S/390 glibc build currently needs Binutils 2.23 in order to have proper
IFUNC support.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-20 12:24 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2013-01-09 16:01 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-06 18:17 ` [Bug build/14770] [s390] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2013-01-09 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2013-01-09 16:00:58 UTC ---
Binutils 2.23 doesn't implement .machinemode yet.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-09 16:01 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-02-06 18:17 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-25 8:15 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-06 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host| |s390*-*-*
Summary|s390 builds fail on |[s390] s390 builds fail on
|binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 |binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
--- Comment #5 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We last increased the required binutils version with:
commit bec039bcefe6a0494a249e2b78e112a0ab60893b
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu Mar 1 21:23:57 2012 +0000
Require binutils 2.20 or later.
It would probably be reasonable to increase the version (globally, for all
targets) again for glibc 2.20, if you wish to propose a patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-06 18:17 ` [Bug build/14770] [s390] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-25 8:15 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
2014-02-25 15:38 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com @ 2014-02-25 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com> ---
(In reply to Joseph Myers from comment #5)
> We last increased the required binutils version with:
>
> commit bec039bcefe6a0494a249e2b78e112a0ab60893b
> Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu Mar 1 21:23:57 2012 +0000
>
> Require binutils 2.20 or later.
>
> It would probably be reasonable to increase the version (globally, for all
> targets) again for glibc 2.20, if you wish to propose a patch.
We will need Binutils 2.24 released in December 2013 for:
- .machinemode when building 32 bit glibc
- and for tbegin being used for pthread lock elision
Binutils 2.24 is probably too recent to require it globally? So we better do
it only for s390 - right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 8:15 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
@ 2014-02-25 15:38 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
2014-02-25 18:03 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com @ 2014-02-25 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 15:38 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
@ 2014-02-25 18:03 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-04-16 11:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2014-02-25 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com wrote:
> We will need Binutils 2.24 released in December 2013 for:
>
> - .machinemode when building 32 bit glibc
> - and for tbegin being used for pthread lock elision
>
> Binutils 2.24 is probably too recent to require it globally? So we better do
> it only for s390 - right?
Yes, I think that's too recent to require globally yet (but it might be
reasonable to require binutils >= 2.23 and GCC >= 4.6 globally).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 18:03 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2014-04-16 11:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-16 11:19 ` stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2014-06-14 11:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-16 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".
The branch, master has been updated
via f19dfa0afd3879cb09e9c6efd7df58e1ee02c029 (commit)
via 4fa8bc3b357150b1977f7701f96cef2590a400a7 (commit)
via 8ea587db2b0bb5cd3e527982f7a1499748a987c3 (commit)
from 9860b0450275ad2b69cb9360fd01d5c122a65fc5 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=f19dfa0afd3879cb09e9c6efd7df58e1ee02c029
commit f19dfa0afd3879cb09e9c6efd7df58e1ee02c029
Author: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Apr 16 13:00:29 2014 +0200
S/390: Regenerate ULPs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=4fa8bc3b357150b1977f7701f96cef2590a400a7
commit 4fa8bc3b357150b1977f7701f96cef2590a400a7
Author: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Apr 16 12:58:02 2014 +0200
[BZ #14770] S/390: Require Binutils >= 2.24 for target S/390.
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=8ea587db2b0bb5cd3e527982f7a1499748a987c3
commit 8ea587db2b0bb5cd3e527982f7a1499748a987c3
Author: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Apr 16 12:52:52 2014 +0200
[BZ #16824] Fix failing y1 due to too large ulps in downward/upward
rounding mode.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
ChangeLog | 16 +
NEWS | 13 +-
sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128/e_j1l.c | 1 +
sysdeps/s390/configure | 68 +++
sysdeps/s390/configure.ac | 8 +
sysdeps/s390/fpu/libm-test-ulps | 1016 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 1116 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-16 11:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-16 11:19 ` stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2014-06-14 11:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2014-04-16 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Stefan Liebler <stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Liebler <stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
fixed with commit in comment 8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/14770] [s390] s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-16 11:19 ` stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2014-06-14 11:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-14 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14770
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-14 11:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-26 9:28 [Bug build/14770] New: s390 builds fail on binutils < 2.21.52.0.1 siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-11-16 11:20 ` [Bug build/14770] " aj at suse dot de
2012-11-20 12:20 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2012-11-20 12:24 ` krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2013-01-09 16:01 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-06 18:17 ` [Bug build/14770] [s390] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-25 8:15 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
2014-02-25 15:38 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
2014-02-25 18:03 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-04-16 11:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-16 11:19 ` stli at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2014-06-14 11:18 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).