public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/14829] sched_* functions wrongly alter thread scheduling, rather than process Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:54:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-14829-131-ZOeiK8ubPL@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-14829-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14829 --- Comment #8 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> --- No. For at least a couple reasons: 1. SETXID is for a process acting on itself. sched_* can target any PID. Having glibc accept SETXID signals from other processes would impose some serious compatibility issues: the sender and receiver would have to have matching ideas of the protocol. The locking to get it right would also be difficult or impossible, and there may be permissions issues about sending the signals. 2. Changing the scheduling parameters of a process is not the same thing as changing the parameters for each thread of the process. Per POSIX, the sched_* functions are specified to be almost complete NOPs, aside from setting and retrieving values and checking permissions, etc., on systems that do not support a process scheduling scope (Linux is such a system). So making them change all threads would just replace one wrong behavior with another. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 13:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-11-11 19:31 [Bug libc/14829] New: " bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2013-06-14 16:36 ` [Bug libc/14829] " carlos at redhat dot com 2013-06-16 4:46 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2013-06-17 19:34 ` carlos at redhat dot com 2013-06-17 20:02 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2013-06-17 20:44 ` carlos at redhat dot com 2013-06-17 21:02 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2014-06-14 11:11 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2014-06-17 12:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2014-06-17 13:54 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-14829-131-ZOeiK8ubPL@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).