From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19328 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2012 20:37:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 19285 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2012 20:37:45 -0000 From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/14979] Incorrect R_386_GLOB_DAT/R_386_JUMP_SLOT handling Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bugdal at aerifal dot cx X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14979 Rich Felker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #8 from Rich Felker 2012-12-21 20:37:45 UTC --- I think this bug report is correct. Treating RELA differently from REL is conceptually wrong. The REL version of the code is already ignoring the addend (the original data at the relocation address), and since i386 normally does not use RELA, it doesn't matter what the RELA code does (it can't break anything if it's not in use), but as long as the code is there it should be consistent. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.