From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3023 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2014 14:32:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2434 invoked by uid 48); 24 Apr 2014 14:31:56 -0000 From: "bernie.ogden at linaro dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug nptl/15119] [arm] unnecessary busy loop in __lll_timedlock_wait on ARM Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: nptl X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernie.ogden at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bernie.ogden at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15119 --- Comment #2 from Bernard Ogden --- Analysis at https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2013-02/msg00021.html makes clear that switching to the generic lowlevellock.c will fix this problem for arm. Neither arm nor hppa appear to contain any significant differences from the generic lowlevellock.c, so we can eliminate both of these platform specific files. This leaves sparc as the only platform with its own lowlevellock.c. In this case the locking structures are different, so we leave this one alone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.