* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
@ 2013-02-25 19:53 ` bagnara at cs dot unipr.it
2013-02-25 23:46 ` martinez at nsup dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bagnara at cs dot unipr.it @ 2013-02-25 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
Roberto Bagnara <bagnara at cs dot unipr.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bagnara at cs dot unipr.it
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
2013-02-25 19:53 ` [Bug math/15194] " bagnara at cs dot unipr.it
@ 2013-02-25 23:46 ` martinez at nsup dot org
2013-02-26 0:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: martinez at nsup dot org @ 2013-02-25 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
--- Comment #1 from Thierry Martinez <martinez at nsup dot org> 2013-02-25 23:46:21 UTC ---
I forgot to include the output of uname -a:
Linux auxerrois 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8 21:44:52 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
2013-02-25 19:53 ` [Bug math/15194] " bagnara at cs dot unipr.it
2013-02-25 23:46 ` martinez at nsup dot org
@ 2013-02-26 0:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-02-26 8:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2013-02-26 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2013-02-26 00:56:58 UTC ---
Are you sure you've run the new binary with the new libc (by linking with
appropriate -Wl,-dynamic-linker -Wl,-rpath options, for example, or
running via /some/where/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path
/some/where/lib64, or using -static to link)? I can't reproduce this with
current sources; it sounds like a duplicate of bug 3976 (fixed) to me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 0:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2013-02-26 8:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-02-26 15:23 ` martinez at nsup dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2013-02-26 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2013-02-26 08:50:42 UTC ---
The preferred way to run against an uninstalled build tree is to use
testrun.sh.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 8:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2013-02-26 15:23 ` martinez at nsup dot org
2013-02-26 15:29 ` aj at suse dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: martinez at nsup dot org @ 2013-02-26 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
--- Comment #4 from Thierry Martinez <martinez at nsup dot org> 2013-02-26 15:23:11 UTC ---
Indeed, I am sorry: I forgot the -static option and ld did not choose the
uninstalled glibc version.
Compiling with
CPATH=$GLIBCGIT/include gcc --verbose -c -o test.o test.c
and linking with
LIBRARY_PATH=$GLIBCGIT/lib gcc --verbose -static -o test test.o
leads to an executable which
- exits with status 158 on Linux 3.2.0-36-generic x86_64, Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS,
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620
- exits with status 158 on Linux 2.6.32-44-generic x86_64, Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS,
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550
- exits with success (status 0) Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64, Debian 6.0.7.
while the code associated to the bug 3976 works correctly on all these
computers when compiled with this glibc version.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 15:23 ` martinez at nsup dot org
@ 2013-02-26 15:29 ` aj at suse dot de
2013-02-26 15:32 ` martinez at nsup dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2013-02-26 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
CC| |aj at suse dot de
Ever Confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2013-02-26 15:28:46 UTC ---
Thierry, your last statement is confusing since you did not mention the glibc
versions.
Am I correct that this is fixed in current git? In that case, let's resolve
this bug as WORKSFORME.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 15:29 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2013-02-26 15:32 ` martinez at nsup dot org
2013-02-26 15:33 ` martinez at nsup dot org
2014-06-13 18:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: martinez at nsup dot org @ 2013-02-26 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
--- Comment #6 from Thierry Martinez <martinez at nsup dot org> 2013-02-26 15:31:24 UTC ---
Oops. Yes, that was with the last glibc version, but it was just the "return
0;" that was missing... Thank you, I was just confused and this bug is already
fixed. I am sorry for the noise!
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 15:32 ` martinez at nsup dot org
@ 2013-02-26 15:33 ` martinez at nsup dot org
2014-06-13 18:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: martinez at nsup dot org @ 2013-02-26 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
Thierry Martinez <martinez at nsup dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #7 from Thierry Martinez <martinez at nsup dot org> 2013-02-26 15:33:06 UTC ---
Resolved.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug math/15194] pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
2013-02-25 16:49 [Bug math/15194] New: pow leads to segmentation fault when called after fesetround(FE_UPWARD); martinez at nsup dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-26 15:33 ` martinez at nsup dot org
@ 2014-06-13 18:47 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-13 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15194
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread