public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/15514] New: pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes
@ 2013-05-22  5:29 guenther at gmail dot com
  2013-05-22  7:29 ` [Bug libc/15514] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: guenther at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-22  5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15514

             Bug #: 15514
           Summary: pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems
                    for 32bit processes
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.17
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: guenther@gmail.com
                CC: drepper.fsp@gmail.com
    Classification: Unclassified


pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) is implemented on top of statfs().  The 32bit version
therefore fails with the error EOVERFLOW if the filesystem that the path is on
is so large that its block count cannot be returned by the non-LFS version of
statfs().

Calls to statfs() that are completely internal to libc, such as this one,
should use the LFS version, statfs64().

According to a quick scan of the glibc source, other calls that might be
affected include posix_openpt() and (maybe) shm_open().

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/15514] pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes
  2013-05-22  5:29 [Bug libc/15514] New: pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes guenther at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-22  7:29 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-04-06  9:56 ` peter@peter-b.co.uk
  2014-06-13 13:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2013-05-22  7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15514

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2013-05-22 07:29:17 UTC ---
Similar to bug 15333.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/15514] pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes
  2013-05-22  5:29 [Bug libc/15514] New: pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes guenther at gmail dot com
  2013-05-22  7:29 ` [Bug libc/15514] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-04-06  9:56 ` peter@peter-b.co.uk
  2014-06-13 13:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: peter@peter-b.co.uk @ 2014-04-06  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15514

Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |peter@peter-b.co.uk

--- Comment #2 from Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk> ---
Created attachment 7538
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7538&action=edit
Proposed patch

Something like the attached?

Most of the pathconf queries use statvfs64(), so it didn't seem unreasonable to
make _PC_NAME_MAX do the same.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/15514] pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes
  2013-05-22  5:29 [Bug libc/15514] New: pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes guenther at gmail dot com
  2013-05-22  7:29 ` [Bug libc/15514] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-04-06  9:56 ` peter@peter-b.co.uk
@ 2014-06-13 13:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-13 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15514

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-13 13:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-22  5:29 [Bug libc/15514] New: pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) fails against large filesystems for 32bit processes guenther at gmail dot com
2013-05-22  7:29 ` [Bug libc/15514] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-04-06  9:56 ` peter@peter-b.co.uk
2014-06-13 13:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).