From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-18771-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9557 invoked by alias); 24 May 2013 22:15:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 9508 invoked by uid 48); 24 May 2013 22:15:10 -0000
From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug math/15532] New: cexp (NaN + i0) wrongly returns NaN + iNaN
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 22:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: math
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.17
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-15532-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15532

            Bug ID: 15532
           Summary: cexp (NaN + i0) wrongly returns NaN + iNaN
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.17
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: math
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

According to C11 Annex G, cexp (NaN + i0) should return NaN + i0.  Instead, it
wrongly returns NaN + iNaN (tested x86_64).  (Extracted from reported LSB
failures.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.