public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
@ 2013-06-05 18:30 zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-05 18:54 ` [Bug build/15585] " carlos at redhat dot com
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zack at buhman dot org @ 2013-06-05 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
Bug ID: 15585
Summary: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: build
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: zack at buhman dot org
CC: carlos at redhat dot com
Created attachment 7058
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7058&action=edit
configure output from glibc when using gcc49
While it builds fine, configure seems to think gcc '4.9' is not a valid version
of gcc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
@ 2013-06-05 18:54 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2013-06-05 18:54 ` carlos at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-05 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
Attach config.log from build directory please.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-05 18:54 ` [Bug build/15585] " carlos at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-05 18:54 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2013-06-06 0:48 ` allan at archlinux dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2013-06-05 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-05 18:54 ` [Bug build/15585] " carlos at redhat dot com
2013-06-05 18:54 ` carlos at redhat dot com
@ 2013-06-06 0:48 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2013-06-06 7:26 ` zack at buhman dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: allan at archlinux dot org @ 2013-06-06 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |allan at archlinux dot org
--- Comment #2 from Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> ---
Also post the "gcc -v" output. Does it say 4.9 rather than 4.9.0?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-06 0:48 ` allan at archlinux dot org
@ 2013-06-06 7:26 ` zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-06 7:27 ` zack at buhman dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zack at buhman dot org @ 2013-06-06 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
--- Comment #3 from Zack Buhman <zack at buhman dot org> ---
Created attachment 7060
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7060&action=edit
glibc-git config.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-06 7:26 ` zack at buhman dot org
@ 2013-06-06 7:27 ` zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-06 7:42 ` allan at archlinux dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zack at buhman dot org @ 2013-06-06 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
--- Comment #4 from Zack Buhman <zack at buhman dot org> ---
Created attachment 7061
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7061&action=edit
gcc -v output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-06 7:27 ` zack at buhman dot org
@ 2013-06-06 7:42 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2013-06-06 12:59 ` zack at buhman dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: allan at archlinux dot org @ 2013-06-06 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
--- Comment #5 from Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> ---
Your gcc is given a version with only two components (4.9) instead of the usual
three (4.9.0). I have not build gcc from SVN in a month, but last time I did
it reported 4.9.0. I'll check if that has changed.
Do you alter "gcc/BASE-VER" when building gcc?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-06 7:42 ` allan at archlinux dot org
@ 2013-06-06 12:59 ` zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-06 13:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2014-06-13 15:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zack at buhman dot org @ 2013-06-06 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
--- Comment #6 from Zack Buhman <zack at buhman dot org> ---
(In reply to Allan McRae from comment #5)
> Do you alter "gcc/BASE-VER" when building gcc?
You are quite correct; the two-component version number is a direct result of
my stupidity.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-06 12:59 ` zack at buhman dot org
@ 2013-06-06 13:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2014-06-13 15:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: allan at archlinux dot org @ 2013-06-06 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/15585] gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-06 13:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
@ 2014-06-13 15:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-13 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15585
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-13 15:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-05 18:30 [Bug build/15585] New: gcc 4.9 is too "old" to build glibc zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-05 18:54 ` [Bug build/15585] " carlos at redhat dot com
2013-06-05 18:54 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2013-06-06 0:48 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2013-06-06 7:26 ` zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-06 7:27 ` zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-06 7:42 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2013-06-06 12:59 ` zack at buhman dot org
2013-06-06 13:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2014-06-13 15:10 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).