From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-18980-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23044 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2013 09:24:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 23001 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jun 2013 09:24:29 -0000
From: "knrstaj at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/15648] multiple definition of `__lll_lock_wait_private'
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: knrstaj at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-15648-131-rVEBaowQv8@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-15648-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-15648-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15648

--- Comment #8 from Neil <knrstaj at gmail dot com> ---
Yes, I see the libc.a and libpthread.a

nm /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.a
lowlevellock.o:
         U __have_futex_clock_realtime
00000030 T __lll_lock_wait
00000000 T __lll_lock_wait_private
00000060 T __lll_timedlock_wait
000001c0 T __lll_timedwait_tid
00000190 T __lll_unlock_wake
00000160 T __lll_unlock_wake_private
         U _dl_sysinfo

nm /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.a
libc-lowlevellock.o:
00000000 T __lll_lock_wait_private
00000030 T __lll_unlock_wake_private
         U _dl_sysinfo

Why not to make __lll_lock_wait_private and __lll_unlock_wake_private in a
individual file?

If ld include libc-lowlevellock.o first, it always cause error when includeing
lowlevellock.o. Right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.