public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "qd.feng@alcatel-lucent.com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/15943] New: localtime_r performance drop when set different timezone
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 02:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-15943-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15943

            Bug ID: 15943
           Summary: localtime_r performance drop when set different
                    timezone
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.12
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: qd.feng@alcatel-lucent.com
                CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com

There is one thread in our application frequently call the localtime_r. We
found the thread performance has 20% drop when change the timezone from the
America/New_york to Asia/Shanghai from the system(Redhat 6,). After profile, we
found it is the localtime_r cause the difference.

When set the timezone as America/New_york, the __tzfile_compute mainly call the
__tzstring. While when set the timezone as the Asia/Shanghai the
__tzfile_compute call the  __tzset_parse_tz which consume most of the CPU time. 

I also do an simple test on our HP G8 server. 

  1 #include <time.h>
  2 #include <stdio.h>
  3
  4  int main(void)
  5  {
  6         struct tm newtime;
  7            time_t ltime;
  8               char buf[50];
  9
 10                   for(int i=0;i<=1000000;i++)
 11                   {
 12                   ltime=time(&ltime);
 13
 14                   localtime_r(&ltime, &newtime);
 15                   }
 16  }

After compile and run command time ./a.out with the timezone as Asia/Shanghai
or 
America/New_York.
Asia/Shanghai 
real  0m1.838s
user  0m1.628s
sys   0m0.206s

America/New_York
real  0m0.608s
user  0m0.395s
sys   0m0.211s

There is no TZ env been set on both cases. I wonder what causes the performance
so difference, is it an designed behavior? 

Steven

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


             reply	other threads:[~2013-09-11  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-11  2:20 qd.feng@alcatel-lucent.com [this message]
2013-09-11  8:02 ` [Bug libc/15943] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-09-11  8:16 ` qd.feng@alcatel-lucent.com
2014-06-13 12:50 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-08-27 22:17 ` [Bug time/15943] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11  2:41 ` eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
2023-01-11  9:28 ` yann at droneaud dot fr
2023-01-11 19:17 ` eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
2023-01-12  0:43 ` gharris at sonic dot net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-15943-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).