[Bug localedata/16078] New Language Locale : Angika (anp)

["cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16078

--- Comment #3 from Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com> ---
I will wait for your revised patch,

Here are some LC_TIME conversions to consider

% Abbreviated weekday names (%a)
% रवि; सोम; मंगल; बुध; बृहस्पति; शुक्र; शनि
abday         "<U0930><U0935><U093F>";/
       "<U0938><U094B><U092E>";/
       "<U092E><U0902><U0917><U0932>";/
       "<U092C><U0941><U0927>";/
       "<U092C><U0943><U0939><U0938><U094D><U092A><U0924><U093F>";/
       "<U0936><U0941><U0915><U094D><U0930>";/
       "<U0936><U0928><U093F>"
%
% Full weekday names (%A)
% रविवार; सोमवार; मंगलवार; बुधवार; बृहस्पतिवार; शुक्रवार; शनिवार
day           "<U0930><U0935><U093F><U0935><U093E><U0930>";/
     "<U0938><U094B><U092E><U0935><U093E><U0930>";/
     "<U092E><U0902><U0917><U0932><U0935><U093E><U0930>";/
     "<U092C><U0941><U0927><U0935><U093E><U0930>";/
    
"<U092C><U0943><U0939><U0938><U094D><U092A><U0924><U093F><U0935><U093E><U0930>";/
     "<U0936><U0941><U0915><U094D><U0930><U0935><U093E><U0930>";/
     "<U0936><U0928><U093F><U0935><U093E><U0930>"
%
% Abbreviated month names (%b)
% जन; फर; मार्च; अप्रै; मई; जून; जुल; अग; सित; अक्टू; नव; दिस
abmon         "<U091C><U0928>";/
       "<U092B><U0930>";/
       "<U092E><U093E><U0930><U094D><U091A>";/
       "<U0905><U092A><U094D><U0930><U0948>";/
       "<U092E><U0908>";/
       "<U091C><U0942><U0928>";/
       "<U091C><U0941><U0932>";/
       "<U0905><U0917>";/
       "<U0938><U093F><U0924>";/
       "<U0905><U0915><U094D><U091F><U0942>";/
       "<U0928><U0935>";/
       "<U0926><U093F><U0938>"
%
% Full month names (%B)
% जनवरी; फरवरी; मार्च; अप्रैल; मई; जून; जुलाई; अगस्त; सितंबर; अक्टूबर; नवंबर;
दिसंबर
mon           "<U091C><U0928><U0935><U0930><U0940>";/
     "<U092B><U0930><U0935><U0930><U0940>";/
     "<U092E><U093E><U0930><U094D><U091A>";/
     "<U0905><U092A><U094D><U0930><U0948><U0932>";/
     "<U092E><U0908>";/
     "<U091C><U0942><U0928>";/
     "<U091C><U0941><U0932><U093E><U0908>";/
     "<U0905><U0917><U0938><U094D><U0924>";/
     "<U0938><U093F><U0924><U0902><U092C><U0930>";/
     "<U0905><U0915><U094D><U091F><U0942><U092C><U0930>";/
     "<U0928><U0935><U0902><U092C><U0930>";/
     "<U0926><U093F><U0938><U0902><U092C><U0930>"
%
% Equivalent of AM PM
% पूर्वाह्न; अपराह्न
am_pm        
"<U092A><U0942><U0930><U094D><U0935><U093E><U0939><U094D><U0928>";/
       "<U0905><U092A><U0930><U093E><U0939><U094D><U0928>"

%
% Appropriate date and time representation
% %A %d %b %Y%I:%M:%S  %Z
d_t_fmt      
"<U0025><U0041><U0020><U0025><U0064><U0020><U0025><U0062><U0020><U0025><U0059><U0025><U0049><U003A><U0025><U004D><U003A><U0025><U0053><U0020><U0020><U0025><U005A>"
%
% Appropriate date representation
% %A %d %b %Y
d_fmt        
"<U0025><U0041><U0020><U0025><U0064><U0020><U0025><U0062><U0020><U0025><U0059>"
%
% Appropriate time representation
% %I:%M:%S  %Z
t_fmt        
"<U0025><U0049><U003A><U0025><U004D><U003A><U0025><U0053><U0020><U0020><U0025><U005A>"
%
% Appropriate 12 h time representation (%r)
% %I:%M:%S/  %p %Z
t_fmt_ampm   
"<U0025><U0049><U003A><U0025><U004D><U003A><U0025><U0053><U002F><U0020><U0020><U0025><U0070><U0020><U0025><U005A>"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
>From glibc-bugs-return-19935-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org Wed Oct 23 14:20:36 2013
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-19935-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2574 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2013 14:20:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
Delivered-To: mailing list glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 2360 invoked by uid 48); 23 Oct 2013 14:20:32 -0000
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug network/16077] Get canonical name from /etc/hosts for AF_INET
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: network
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.18
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bugdal at aerifal dot cx
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: siddhesh at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-16077-131-1orkj2OT4x@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-16077-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-16077-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1414

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id\x16077

Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugdal at aerifal dot cx

--- Comment #1 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> ---
How do you define "canonical" for entries from the hosts file? The first
hostname on the matching line? For DNS, "canonical" is defined clearly by POSIX
to mean the result of resolving a CNAME record (as opposed to other erroneous
notions like reverse lookups), and POSIX further specifies:

"if the canonical name is not available, then ai_canonname shall refer to the
nodename argument or a string with the same contents"

so the current behavior is correct if hosts file entries do not have canonical
names. On the other hand, some flexibility is allowed:

"Since different implementations use different conceptual models, the terms
``canonical name'' and ``alias'' cannot be precisely defined for the general
case. However, Domain Name System implementations are expected to interpret
them as they are used in RFC 1034."

So I see no problem with defining a notion of "canonical" for hosts file
entries, but I also see no fundamental reason it's necessary.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.