[Bug localedata/16095] New: glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[Bug localedata/16095] New: glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[maiku.fabian at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

            Bug ID: 16095
           Summary: glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the
                    Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: localedata
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
                CC: libc-locales at sourceware dot org

Created attachment 7259
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7259&action=edit
0001-Support-UTF-8-locale-for-Uzbek-in-Latin-script.patch

Version: current master

There is no UTF-8 locale for Uzbek written in Latin script:

    mfabian@ari:~
    $ locale -a | grep ^uz
    uz_UZ
    uz_UZ.iso88591
    uz_UZ.utf8@cyrillic
    uz_UZ@cyrillic
    mfabian@ari:~
    $ LC_ALL=uz_UZ locale charmap
    ISO-8859-1
    mfabian@ari:~
    $

I.e., although there is an UTF-8 locale for Uzbek written in Cyrillic
script, the Uzbek locales for Latin script are available only in
ISO-8859-1 encoding.

But Latin script is more common nowadays for Uzbek, see:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uzbek_language#Writing_systems

CLDR also made Latin script the default for Uzbek recently, see

    http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/6548 (Update country/language/pop for
Uzbek)

    http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/changeset/9155 (cldrbug 6548: Updated
Uzbekistan Latin/Cyrillic? usage to better reflect modern education / usage.)

Therefore, it is not nice to use a if only a non-UTF-8 locale
can be used for Uzbek in Latin script, it is not nice to use
non-UTF-8 locales nowadays if one can avoid it.

Therefore, an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale should be  built as well.

Patch against current master attached.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[carlos at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |carlos at redhat dot com,
                   |                            |cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
Chris,

What are your thoughts on this? Should we be globally using UTF-8 for all the
locales we put in SUPPORTED? It seems like everyone wants a UTF-8 locale these
days.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[joseph at codesourcery dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
It's generally expected that any new locale will just be <locale>, using 
UTF-8, not <locale>.UTF-8 (that is, <locale>.UTF-8 is only, or at least 
primarily, for cases where <locale> is a pre-existing non-UTF-8 locale).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

--- Comment #3 from Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #1)
> Chris,
> 
> What are your thoughts on this? Should we be globally using UTF-8 for all
> the locales we put in SUPPORTED? It seems like everyone wants a UTF-8 locale
> these days.

I am a big fan of UTF-8 whereever it can be used (as a general rule).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[carlos at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

--- Comment #4 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> It's generally expected that any new locale will just be <locale>, using 
> UTF-8, not <locale>.UTF-8 (that is, <locale>.UTF-8 is only, or at least 
> primarily, for cases where <locale> is a pre-existing non-UTF-8 locale).

(In reply to Chris Leonard from comment #3)
> (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #1)
> > Chris,
> > 
> > What are your thoughts on this? Should we be globally using UTF-8 for all
> > the locales we put in SUPPORTED? It seems like everyone wants a UTF-8 locale
> > these days.
> 
> I am a big fan of UTF-8 whereever it can be used (as a general rule).

In this case given the existing locale, and that most people want a UTF-8
locale, is there any reason not to enable Uzbek in UTF8?

I figure add it to SUPPORTED, and then check that it installs without error
encoded as UTF-8 and then check it in?

Am I missing anything else?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[maiku.fabian at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

--- Comment #5 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
By the way, I built an tested my patch on Fedora 19, see:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999535#c2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[maiku.fabian at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

--- Comment #6 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> It's generally expected that any new locale will just be <locale>, using 
> UTF-8, not <locale>.UTF-8 (that is, <locale>.UTF-8 is only, or at least 
> primarily, for cases where <locale> is a pre-existing non-UTF-8 locale).

Which seems to be the case here, “uz_UZ” already exists and uses
ISO-8859-1 encoding, unfortunately.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
>From glibc-bugs-return-19998-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org Tue Oct 29 11:49:28 2013
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-19998-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20784 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2013 11:49:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
Delivered-To: mailing list glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 20740 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2013 11:49:23 -0000
From: "schwab@linux-m68k.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug manual/16074] Document that mmap() returns MAP_FAILED on error, as per the POSIX standard.
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: manual
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: schwab@linux-m68k.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 2.19
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-16074-131-oVptgdZrtf@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-16074-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-16074-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2
Content-length: 563

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id\x16074

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |2.19

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Fixed in 52e6d80.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  bd1b9d956b9ce90a5fa265bde97d984129cffae9 (commit)
      from  2bf1804182cc4bd671193587c8d5e3de45a9618e (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=bd1b9d956b9ce90a5fa265bde97d984129cffae9

commit bd1b9d956b9ce90a5fa265bde97d984129cffae9
Author: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date:   Tue Nov 12 11:16:14 2013 +0100

    Install uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale (BZ #16095)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 NEWS                 |   20 ++++++++++----------
 localedata/ChangeLog |    5 +++++
 localedata/SUPPORTED |    1 +
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[schwab@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |2.20

--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Fixed in 2.20.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16095] glibc should build an uz_UZ.UTF-8 locale, not only the Latin1 locales uz_UZ uz_UZ.iso88591

[fweimer at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.