public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/16291] feature request: provide simpler ways to compute stack and tls boundaries
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-16291-131-EZl2hcBT9t@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-16291-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16291

--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #1)
> Do you want to get the information for the calling thread, or for an
> arbitrary target thread? The latter is much harder.

Thanks for clarification. We need only the simple case:
find the stack and tls boundaries for the calling thread. 

> 
> For the main thread, determining its stack extents is difficult and libc
> really has nothing to do with it; the kernel is mostly responsible. One end
> is fixed and libc could easily record that and provide it, 

Even getting one end would be helpful. 
We can continue to deduct the second end from /proc/self/maps and getrlimit

> but the moving
> end is hard to measure except by the main thread itself where you can just
> look at the current value of the stack pointer. Of course one issue is
> whether you want the _current_ extents of the stack or the maximum possible
> extents. 

We need the maximum possible.
Of course, this is not very useful if the stack is unlimited.

> Getting the latter is difficult and may even be impossible under
> certain conditions where setrlimit has been used to adjust it during the
> program's lifetime.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04  4:49 [Bug libc/16291] New: " konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2013-12-04  9:19 ` [Bug libc/16291] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2013-12-04  9:34 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com [this message]
2013-12-04  9:56 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2013-12-04 10:24 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2013-12-04 14:35 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-12-04 14:49 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2013-12-04 15:46 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2013-12-04 17:20 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2013-12-04 17:33 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2013-12-05  3:54 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2013-12-11 11:01 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2013-12-11 15:14 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-16 15:07 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-22  8:50 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com
2014-01-22 19:54 ` earthdok at google dot com
2014-01-23 15:45 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-23 15:57 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-23 16:07 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2014-01-24  8:46 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-27  1:28 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-27  7:16 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-29 10:00 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-29 10:26 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-29 10:40 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-29 14:25 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-29 15:23 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-29 18:21 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-29 18:35 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-29 18:50 ` earthdok at google dot com
2014-01-30  5:10 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-30  5:13 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-30 19:06 ` earthdok at google dot com
2014-01-30 19:21 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-30 19:43 ` earthdok at google dot com
2014-01-31  5:05 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-31  5:31 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-31  5:50 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-31  6:08 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-31  7:02 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-01-31  8:57 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-31 19:00 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-31 19:23 ` fche at redhat dot com
2014-01-31 19:40 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-01-31 20:43 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-01-31 22:33 ` earthdok at google dot com
2014-02-03  8:14 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-02-03  9:11 ` octoploid at yandex dot com
2014-02-03 14:35 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-02-03 15:59 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-02-04 14:18 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-02-04 14:30 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-02-04 18:50 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-02-04 19:08 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-04-04  8:50 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-04-04 20:43 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-04-22 10:24 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2014-06-13 11:48 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-16291-131-EZl2hcBT9t@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).