From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30856 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2014 16:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30778 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2014 16:46:41 -0000 From: "zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug math/16353] expm1 missing underflows Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: math X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.19 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 --- Comment #3 from Paul Zimmermann --- (In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #2) > Assuming you mean underflow not overflow, this does not seem spurious > (i.e., the return value and exceptions both appear consistent with an > infinite-precision value that is only slightly inaccurate). ok, then I retract Comment 1. (And yes, I meant underflow.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.