From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1199 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2014 18:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1151 invoked by uid 55); 4 Feb 2014 18:16:36 -0000 From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug network/16421] IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED can use undefined s6_addr32 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: network X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16421 --- Comment #15 from Carlos O'Donell --- On 02/04/2014 01:08 PM, alvarezp at alvarezp dot ods.org wrote: >> Not an option. Please leave the __GNUC__ implementation for optimally >> supporting those using GNU extensions. > > Patch #1, the original one from Sebastien does exactly that. Repost that patch to libc-alpha then for review. >> The fix I'll accept is: >> >> - Unconditionally define __u6_* in the union. >> - Fix all the macros. >> - Test that. > > By "fix all the macros", do you mean, rewrite them so they don't use statement > expressions? No, I mean fix them to use __u6_* in the union reference so they operate independently of the public definitions of the struct members. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.