[Bug localedata/16857] New: Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[Bug localedata/16857] New: Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[meghrajsuthar03 at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

            Bug ID: 16857
           Summary: Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.15
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: localedata
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: meghrajsuthar03 at gmail dot com
                CC: libc-locales at sourceware dot org

Created attachment 7556
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7556&action=edit
Details about the Rajasthani language has been described in this file.

About 20 million people speak this language in India and highly used in the
local areas of India(Rajasthan).

More details can be find at..  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajasthani_language

We need the creation of locale for Rajasthani language.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[rranjan at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

Rajesh Ranjan <rranjan at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |chandankumar.093047 at gmail dot c
                   |                            |om, rranjan at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[siddhesh at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |siddhesh at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> ---
Thanks, please post on the libc-alpha mailing list with a patch to add this to
glibc.  Guidelines to do so are here:

https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[fweimer at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[pravin.d.s at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

Pravin S <pravin.d.s at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pravin.d.s at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Pravin S <pravin.d.s at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 7635
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7635&action=edit
New locale raj_IN

Hi,

  I have improved and made attachment to glibc locale format and submitted to
libc-locales mailing list.

 ISO code for locale http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=raj

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[rranjan at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

--- Comment #3 from Rajesh Ranjan <rranjan at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Pravin S from comment #2)
> Created attachment 7635 [details]
> New locale raj_IN
> 
> Hi,
> 
>   I have improved and made attachment to glibc locale format and submitted
> to libc-locales mailing list.
>  
>  ISO code for locale http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=raj

Pravin,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajasthani_language

as per the page, raj is the inclusive code similar to 'bh' code for Bihari. So
Rajasthani is not a language but a set of language of the following:

bgq – Bagri
gda – Gade Lohar
gju – Gujari
mup – Malvi
wbr – Wagdi
lmn – Lambadi
noe – Nimadi
lrk – Loarki

So I think we should go for one of them ^^ instead of the 'raj'. When
suggesting to Meghraj for having a locale of 'rajasthani', I was not aware of
the fact as talk in parliament of India is going to recognize Rajasthani as
official language. Little confusing! 

Meghraj What do you say!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
>From glibc-bugs-return-22874-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org Fri Jun 13 08:41:11 2014
Return-Path: <glibc-bugs-return-22874-listarch-glibc-bugs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21871 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2014 08:41:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:glibc-bugs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:glibc-bugs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org
Delivered-To: mailing list glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 21602 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2014 08:41:07 -0000
From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug math/16545] Test failures: small differences in float/double y0, etc.
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: math
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.19
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name
Message-ID: <bug-16545-131-wsa4qnMwQM@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-16545-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-16545-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2
Content-length: 378

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id\x16545

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[pravin.d.s at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

--- Comment #4 from Pravin S <pravin.d.s at gmail dot com> ---
In that case, we need to select appropriate language code for this locale.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[meghrajsuthar03 at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

--- Comment #5 from meghrajsuthar03 at gmail dot com <meghrajsuthar03 at gmail dot com> ---
Yeah, @Rajesh JI, as far as i considered on the behalf of other language like, 
bh for bihari etc, so i supposed to go with 'raj' for rajasthani.
@Pravin, if you think we should go for another one then we can go.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[pravin.d.s at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

--- Comment #6 from Pravin S <pravin.d.s at gmail dot com> ---
If 

a. "raj" is not correct code or
b   we can provide better code than "raj" from its group language.


I think, we can go with "raj" for now
http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/scope.asp#M

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[rranjan at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

--- Comment #7 from Rajesh Ranjan <rranjan at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Pravin S from comment #6)
> If 
> 
> a. "raj" is not correct code or
> b   we can provide better code than "raj" from its group language.
> 
> 
> I think, we can go with "raj" for now
> http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/scope.asp#M

Pravin,

Actually, though, mentioned as a language group, Rajasthani is one language for
which demand is to be considered as an 8th schedule language of india. 

http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/Give-Bhojpuri-Rajasthani-Official-Language-Status-MPs/809198

http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/report-rajasthani-language-yet-to-find-mention-in-8th-schedule-say-authors-at-zee-jaipur-literature-festival-1954349

So, can be considered as a locale as some institutions think like this: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajasthani_language

"Today, however, Sahitya Akademi, National Academy of Letters and University
Grants Commission recognise it as a distinct language."

So can be considered if standard Rajasthani is used.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)

[pravin.d.s at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857

--- Comment #8 from Pravin S <pravin.d.s at gmail dot com> ---
Thanks for confirming it. Submitted patch to libc-alpha.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.