From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25890 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2014 23:29:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25846 invoked by uid 48); 11 Aug 2014 23:29:47 -0000 From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/17259] New: sysdeps/x86_64/cacheinfo.c:intel_check_word corrupts rbx and another register Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 23:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17259 Bug ID: 17259 Summary: sysdeps/x86_64/cacheinfo.c:intel_check_word corrupts rbx and another register Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libc Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pageexec at gmail dot com CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com the inline asm invoking cpuid tries to save/restore rbx itself but unlike its i386 version, this one will actually corrupt (zero out) the top 32 bits of both rbx and whatever register gets assigned to %1 due to the "xchg ebx,%1". this code was probably simply copy-pasted from the i386 version. note that the same file actually contains a proper implementation of cpuid as the __cpuid_count macro that had been there some 2 years before this new and buggy 'invention'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.