public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "scarybeasts at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug malloc/17344] New: Enhance glibc metadata hardening with the attached patch Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 01:31:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-17344-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17344 Bug ID: 17344 Summary: Enhance glibc metadata hardening with the attached patch Product: glibc Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: malloc Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: scarybeasts at gmail dot com Created attachment 7769 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7769&action=edit Check linked list integrity for the large sized chunk list too. As a follow-on from my recent glibc exploit: http://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-poisoned-nul-byte-2014-edition.html I'd have really been slowed down, perhaps even stopped, if the the existing metadata hardening tricks were extended to one more place. I've attached a patch. It checks doubly-linked list integrity on unlink in one more place: the linked list for larger-sized chunks. Please consider applying it. There was already an assert() for this check, this patch simply elevates this from an assert() to a runtime check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-03 1:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-09-03 1:31 scarybeasts at gmail dot com [this message] 2014-09-04 11:15 ` [Bug malloc/17344] " fweimer at redhat dot com 2014-09-10 8:23 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2014-09-11 9:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-09-11 9:03 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2014-10-31 21:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-17344-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).