public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "arjun.is at lostca dot se" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug stdio/17522] `fputws' errors out when writing wide characters to unbuffered stream
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-17522-131-PbFSZYQKP9@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-17522-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17522

--- Comment #3 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> ---
(In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #2)
> This is a bug in tst-skeleton.c IMO, it should allocate a buffer large
> enough for the test to succeed, but small enough that you still get output
> as quickly as possible in the even of a crash.
> 
> Thus tst-skeleton.c needs to be enhanced to allow the test to define the
> size of the stdout buffer it needs and then that can be allocated and passed
> to setvbuf?

Reading the definitions of setvbuf [1] and fputws [2] didn't make it clear to
me that fputws is going to error out when writing a multi-byte character to an
unbuffered stream.

Andreas notes that there is a single byte buffer associated with unbuffered
streams. Is this single byte buffer present in accordance with some contract
offered by unbuffered streams? If not, then can I call the one byte buffer an
implementation detail? If it is an implementation detail, would it make sense
to associate each unbuffered stream with a buffer just wide enough to represent
one wide character in the chosen encoding scheme, instead of just one byte?
i.e. in the case of UTF-8, I guess this would mean a 4 byte buffer.

[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/setvbuf.html
[2] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/fputws.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-29 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-29 15:57 [Bug stdio/17522] New: " arjun.is at lostca dot se
2014-10-29 18:03 ` [Bug stdio/17522] " carlos at redhat dot com
2014-10-29 18:43 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se [this message]
2014-10-29 18:49 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-10-29 19:12 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
2014-10-29 19:16 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-11-03  9:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-03  9:03 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-12-16 11:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-20 15:43 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-17522-131-PbFSZYQKP9@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).