public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/17662] New: please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall
@ 2014-11-28 14:41 miklos at szeredi dot hu
2014-11-28 16:52 ` [Bug libc/17662] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-11-28 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: miklos at szeredi dot hu @ 2014-11-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662
Bug ID: 17662
Summary: please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: miklos at szeredi dot hu
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/17662] please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall 2014-11-28 14:41 [Bug libc/17662] New: please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall miklos at szeredi dot hu @ 2014-11-28 16:52 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2014-11-28 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2014-11-28 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- Please use libc-alpha, not Bugzilla, to propose new APIs; Bugzilla is for objective bugs, not subjective questions about the desirability of features. There is no consensus on when Linux-specific interfaces should have bindings in glibc; you need to join the thread starting at <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-10/msg00541.html> and help the community reach a consensus (and then maybe help with the analysis to determine what syscalls merit bindings according to that consensus, and with the implementation of those bindings). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/17662] please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall 2014-11-28 14:41 [Bug libc/17662] New: please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall miklos at szeredi dot hu 2014-11-28 16:52 ` [Bug libc/17662] " joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2014-11-28 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2014-11-28 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- And see <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-10/msg00591.html> specifically for disagreement with adding Linux-specific interfaces (as opposed to deciding an interface is generally meaningful for any OS supported by glibc and should be part of the generic API from glibc, with ENOSYS stubs for platforms where it's not implemented). That viewpoint is what you need to engage with, on libc-alpha, if you wish to reach consensus on adding new syscall bindings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-28 16:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-11-28 14:41 [Bug libc/17662] New: please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall miklos at szeredi dot hu 2014-11-28 16:52 ` [Bug libc/17662] " joseph at codesourcery dot com 2014-11-28 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).