From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2689A3858C2F; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:39:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2689A3858C2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1702460369; bh=YKBYY7zCmWvfBxDmxoXYRBE0Cphdd4LpangDVIrnQUg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JtNyETN1hLvD/W+YAO2V5t4VW375j2FmeIluvZbYwgsJgQAxZ3gNR0nKBM4n4Kzg1 qg045m0EqIBe1kTxkLZGXSs3EqTa0awSB+f2xeA3QcjCgPsrTADKM8+dorGu/rkocG MadIq25ptg4PUGwXjQJeOsWTQgVxUPemBstOZBhg= From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/1890] strerror() unnecessarily non thread-safe Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:39:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.3.6 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 2.32 X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1890 --- Comment #12 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Bruno Haible from comment #11) > Is a value corruption less severe because it appears less frequently? I > would argue the opposite way: If it appears less frequently, there are le= ss > chances that it gets caught through a test suite and thus gets eliminated > from an application. It's a philosophical question. It's also not something we can fix with symb= ol versions anymore because the release went out with an unversioned change. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=