public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
@ 2015-09-25 16:42 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 18:14 ` [Bug libc/19007] " carlos at redhat dot com
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-09-25 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

            Bug ID: 19007
           Summary: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

On x86_64-pc-linux-gnu I get with gcc-5 or gcc-6:

FAIL: elf/check-localplt 

markus@x4 glibc-build % cat elf/check-localplt.out
Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: realloc
Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: realloc
Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: malloc
Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: calloc
Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: __libc_memalign
Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: memalign
Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: calloc

markus@x4 glibc-build % ld -v
GNU ld (Gentoo git) 2.25.51.20150907

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 18:14 ` carlos at redhat dot com
  2015-09-25 18:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2015-09-25 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
                 CC|                            |carlos at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0)
> On x86_64-pc-linux-gnu I get with gcc-5 or gcc-6:
> 
> FAIL: elf/check-localplt 
> 
> markus@x4 glibc-build % cat elf/check-localplt.out
> Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: realloc
> Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: realloc
> Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: malloc
> Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: calloc
> Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: __libc_memalign
> Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: memalign
> Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: calloc
> 
> markus@x4 glibc-build % ld -v
> GNU ld (Gentoo git) 2.25.51.20150907

This is a serious issue since it would mean that malloc et. al. are no longer
interposable, and that users can no longer provide their own malloc
implementation e.g. jemalloc, tcmalloc.

Nobody else with GCC5 has seen thsi problem, might it be unique to your
configuration? Are you using something like -fno-plot with -z relro and -z
bindnow? It wouldn't be a standard configuration, but it's the only
configuration I can think of that would be able to remove these PLT entries.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 18:14 ` [Bug libc/19007] " carlos at redhat dot com
@ 2015-09-25 18:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 18:41   ` Carlos O'Donell
  2015-09-25 18:42 ` carlos at redhat dot com
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-09-25 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
No, everything is pretty vanilla:

CFLAGS="-g -O2 -pipe" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -pipe" ~/glibc/configure --prefix=/usr
--libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-headers=/usr/include
--enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=4.0 --with-tls --with-__thread
--enable-bind-now --without-gd --without-cvs --disable-profile
--disable-multi-arch --disable-werror

I just installed the resulting glibc and interposing malloc works just fine,
e.g.:

LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libllalloc.so.1.3 some_program

So it must be a false positive.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 18:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 18:41   ` Carlos O'Donell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2015-09-25 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: markus at trippelsdorf dot de, glibc-bugs

On 09/25/2015 02:26 PM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
> So it must be a false positive.

So what does eu-readelf say about the DSO?

 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 18:14 ` [Bug libc/19007] " carlos at redhat dot com
  2015-09-25 18:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 18:42 ` carlos at redhat dot com
  2015-09-25 18:54 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2015-09-25 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #3 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
On 09/25/2015 02:26 PM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
> So it must be a false positive.

So what does eu-readelf say about the DSO?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 18:42 ` carlos at redhat dot com
@ 2015-09-25 18:54 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 19:00 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-09-25 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
Looks good, e.g. /lib/ld-2.22.90.so:

Relocation section [ 7] '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x878 contains 16 entries:
  Offset              Type            Value               Addend Name
  0x0000000000225d90  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +72544 
  0x0000000000225d98  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +67680 
  0x0000000000225da0  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +67104 
  0x0000000000225da8  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +77984 
  0x0000000000225db0  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +42976 
  0x0000000000225db8  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +84032 
  0x0000000000225dc0  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +87264 
  0x0000000000225dc8  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +96672 
  0x0000000000225dd0  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +82912 
  0x0000000000225dd8  X86_64_RELATIVE 000000000000000000  +106912 
  0x0000000000225fc8  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a480      +0
__libc_memalign
  0x0000000000225fd0  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a580      +0 malloc
  0x0000000000225fd8  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a5a0      +0 calloc
  0x0000000000225fe0  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a7c0      +0 realloc
  0x0000000000225fe8  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x0000000000227100      +0 _r_debug
  0x0000000000225ff0  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a5e0      +0 free

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 18:54 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 19:00 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 19:20   ` Carlos O'Donell
  2015-09-25 19:02 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-09-25 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
So I guess something like this is needed:

diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/localplt.data b/sysdeps/x86_64/localplt.data
index d140476dfeff..f168b143ff26 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/localplt.data
+++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/localplt.data
@@ -3,17 +3,17 @@
 # users can define their own functions and have library internals call them.
 # Linker in binutils 2.26 and newer consolidates R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT
 # relocation with R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT relocation against the same symbol.
-libc.so: calloc
+libc.so: calloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
 libc.so: free + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
 libc.so: malloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
-libc.so: memalign
-libc.so: realloc
+libc.so: memalign + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
+libc.so: realloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
 libm.so: matherr
 # The dynamic loader uses __libc_memalign internally to allocate aligned
 # TLS storage. The other malloc family of functions are expected to allow
 # user symbol interposition.
-ld.so: __libc_memalign
-ld.so: malloc
-ld.so: calloc
-ld.so: realloc
+ld.so: __libc_memalign + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
+ld.so: malloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
+ld.so: calloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
+ld.so: realloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT
 ld.so: free + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 19:00 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 19:02 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 19:16 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-09-25 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
CCing H.J.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 19:02 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 19:16 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-09-25 19:20 ` carlos at redhat dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-09-25 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> Looks good, e.g. /lib/ld-2.22.90.so:
>  
> Relocation section [ 7] '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x878 contains 16 entries:

>   0x0000000000225fd0  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a580      +0 malloc
>   0x0000000000225fd8  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a5a0      +0 calloc
>   0x0000000000225fe0  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a7c0      +0 realloc
>   0x0000000000225fe8  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x0000000000227100      +0 _r_debug
>   0x0000000000225ff0  X86_64_GLOB_DAT 0x000000000001a5e0      +0 free

Please show me:

# readelf -rW libc_pic.a | grep calloc | wc -l
# readelf -rW libc_pic.a | grep calloc | grep -v R_X86_64_PLT32

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 19:00 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 19:20   ` Carlos O'Donell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2015-09-25 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: markus at trippelsdorf dot de, glibc-bugs

On 09/25/2015 03:00 PM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
> So I guess something like this is needed:
> 
> -libc.so: calloc
> +libc.so: calloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT

This is a new binutils. I agree that HJ needs to think about how we want
to represent this such that it work with old and new binutils.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 19:16 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-09-25 19:20 ` carlos at redhat dot com
  2015-09-25 19:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2015-09-25 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #8 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
On 09/25/2015 03:00 PM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
> So I guess something like this is needed:
> 
> -libc.so: calloc
> +libc.so: calloc + RELA R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT

This is a new binutils. I agree that HJ needs to think about how we want
to represent this such that it work with old and new binutils.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with  gcc-5/6
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 19:20 ` carlos at redhat dot com
@ 2015-09-25 19:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-09-25 21:16 ` [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutuls 2.26 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-09-25 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
markus@x4 glibc-build % readelf -rW libc_pic.a | grep calloc | wc -l
47
markus@x4 glibc-build % readelf -rW libc_pic.a | grep calloc | grep -v
R_X86_64_PLT32
markus@x4 glibc-build %

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutuls 2.26
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 19:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-09-25 21:16 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-09-25 21:17 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-09-25 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|FAIL: elf/check-localplt    |FAIL: elf/check-localplt
                   |with  gcc-5/6               |with -z now and binutuls
                   |                            |2.26

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutuls 2.26
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 21:16 ` [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutuls 2.26 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-09-25 21:17 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-09-25 21:27 ` [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26 schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-09-25 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
A patch is posted at

https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-09/msg00655.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 21:17 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-09-25 21:27 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2015-10-01 12:34 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2015-09-25 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|FAIL: elf/check-localplt    |FAIL: elf/check-localplt
                   |with -z now and binutuls    |with -z now and binutils
                   |2.26                        |2.26

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-25 21:27 ` [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26 schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2015-10-01 12:34 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
  2015-10-01 12:40 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-10-14 13:35 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2015-10-01 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fweimer at redhat dot com
              Flags|                            |security-

--- Comment #11 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
Just to clarify: malloc etc. are still interposable, it's just a pure test case
failure?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-10-01 12:34 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2015-10-01 12:40 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2015-10-14 13:35 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2015-10-01 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #11)
> Just to clarify: malloc etc. are still interposable, it's just a pure test
> case failure?

Yes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26
  2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-10-01 12:40 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2015-10-14 13:35 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-10-14 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |2.23

--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-14 13:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-25 16:42 [Bug libc/19007] New: FAIL: elf/check-localplt with gcc-5/6 markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-09-25 18:14 ` [Bug libc/19007] " carlos at redhat dot com
2015-09-25 18:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-09-25 18:41   ` Carlos O'Donell
2015-09-25 18:42 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2015-09-25 18:54 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-09-25 19:00 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-09-25 19:20   ` Carlos O'Donell
2015-09-25 19:02 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-09-25 19:16 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-09-25 19:20 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2015-09-25 19:26 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-09-25 21:16 ` [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutuls 2.26 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-09-25 21:17 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-09-25 21:27 ` [Bug libc/19007] FAIL: elf/check-localplt with -z now and binutils 2.26 schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-10-01 12:34 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-10-01 12:40 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-10-14 13:35 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).