From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1A10C385840C; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:40:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1A10C385840C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1705498818; bh=Hd/0+XOOwrsASuXQuhYIoxj8pJDsG5u2nm2omiCtgi8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wIK7zzAxbA6B8RCqyG2S+0S9tjushhWdS+u3CaGdVhzKKZDjXPfReUjSt9BZkUFDi vUnH6sSjQSugCTuX8TKk1gG2ATLo/jcYW8A081m25jNgrlk4lEYX9iHsMZ2aXfE6Zm 4aGV48wBlnyQ5pQW2BWgZJ60pMDcLJ0YioI5D5rg= From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:40:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: build X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.23 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: davem at davemloft dot net X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 2.25 X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D19477 --- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Hmm, I'll have to check what's the oldest UltraSPARC CPU that supports v9a = and VIS. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=