public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "quentusrex at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug libc/2099] Support for SRV records in getaddrinfo
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 23:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-2099-131-qIj6Z1tdfz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-2099-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2099

--- Comment #6 from William King <quentusrex at gmail dot com> 2011-01-09 23:10:30 UTC ---
More specifically: 

Given than applications that use getaddrinfo() pass in a host name, (sometimes)
a service name, also struct addrinfo *hints, plus the response struct addrinfo
**res. Usually after checking for an error pass the res structure directly into
the connect() function. The current advantage is that the application does not
have to deal with ipv4 or ipv6 differences(unless it wants to restrict to only
one of the two). 

In the file sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c and a few lines into the function
gaih_inet() right after the protocol and socket type are checked, I propose
adding a check to see "if(service != NULL && (req->ai_flags & GAI_SRV_ENABLE))
{ /* handle SRV lookups */}"

This way if the SRV lookup does return a list of addresses then getaddrinfo()
will return the SRV records, in the order they should be used, but if the SRV
lookup does not return any useful records, then getaddrinfo() will fall back to
the standard lookups below. 

Thoughts?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-09 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-2099-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-09 11:08 ` quentusrex at gmail dot com
2011-01-09 23:10 ` quentusrex at gmail dot com [this message]
2012-03-20 14:26 ` binki at gentoo dot org
2012-07-29 22:51 ` psimerda at redhat dot com
2012-11-19 14:52 ` psimerda at redhat dot com
2012-12-18 14:29 ` psimerda at redhat dot com
2012-12-19 23:39 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-02-07  2:52 ` [Bug network/2099] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21  2:45 ` jscott at posteo dot net
2005-12-30 23:26 [Bug libc/2099] New: " fredrik at dolda2000 dot com
2006-01-15 16:28 ` [Bug libc/2099] " aj at suse dot de
2006-01-15 17:15 ` fredrik at dolda2000 dot com
2006-05-03  6:46 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-05-06  3:28 ` drepper at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-2099-131-qIj6Z1tdfz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).