public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
[not found] <bug-2489-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-10-12 17:19 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-14 14:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: neleai at seznam dot cz @ 2013-10-12 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |neleai at seznam dot cz
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> ---
Closing as when I looked for SIGRTMIN it is now defined at signum.h, A
signums.h file is not present now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
[not found] <bug-2489-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2013-10-12 17:19 ` [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX neleai at seznam dot cz
@ 2013-10-14 14:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-14 14:36 ` Ondřej Bílka
2013-10-14 14:36 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-14 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't see SIGRTMIN in sysdeps/unix/bsd/bits/signum.h which looks like what
Hurd would use.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
[not found] <bug-2489-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2013-10-12 17:19 ` [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-14 14:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-14 14:36 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-14 22:51 ` samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org
2013-10-15 5:47 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: neleai at seznam dot cz @ 2013-10-14 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
--- Comment #3 from Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> ---
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 02:13:48PM +0000, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
>
> Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
> Resolution|FIXED |---
>
> --- Comment #2 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I don't see SIGRTMIN in sysdeps/unix/bsd/bits/signum.h which looks like what
> Hurd would use.
>
Nice confirming of bug. Could you add these?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
2013-10-14 14:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-14 14:36 ` Ondřej Bílka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ondřej Bílka @ 2013-10-14 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org; +Cc: glibc-bugs
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 02:13:48PM +0000, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
>
> Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
> Resolution|FIXED |---
>
> --- Comment #2 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I don't see SIGRTMIN in sysdeps/unix/bsd/bits/signum.h which looks like what
> Hurd would use.
>
Nice confirming of bug. Could you add these?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
[not found] <bug-2489-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-14 14:36 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
@ 2013-10-14 22:51 ` samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org
2013-10-15 5:47 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org @ 2013-10-14 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.or
| |g
--- Comment #4 from Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> ---
Hello,
Yes, that is where we are looking at, not the linux definitions (see the
component and host of this bug).
Now it's not a as simple as putting a value: RT signals are not implemented yet
on the Hurd, so these should actually not be defined for now.
Samuel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
[not found] <bug-2489-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-14 22:51 ` samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org
@ 2013-10-15 5:47 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: neleai at seznam dot cz @ 2013-10-15 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> ---
> Now it's not a as simple as putting a value:
> RT signals are not implemented yet on the Hurd,
> so these should actually not be defined for now.
A patch does do 404. I am not sure if this is real bug as given nature of hurd
these are not implemented and never will.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX
2006-03-25 22:16 [Bug hurd/2489] New: " bddebian at comcast dot net
@ 2006-11-22 13:42 ` tschwinge at gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tschwinge at gnu dot org @ 2006-11-22 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bug-hurd at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2489
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-15 5:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-2489-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2013-10-12 17:19 ` [Bug hurd/2489] Missing definitions for SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-14 14:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-14 14:36 ` Ondřej Bílka
2013-10-14 14:36 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2013-10-14 22:51 ` samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org
2013-10-15 5:47 ` neleai at seznam dot cz
2006-03-25 22:16 [Bug hurd/2489] New: " bddebian at comcast dot net
2006-11-22 13:42 ` [Bug hurd/2489] " tschwinge at gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).