From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 401F8397305B; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:44:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 401F8397305B
From: "wangxuszcn at foxmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug malloc/25945] ASLR information leak via Safe-Linking and tcache
 or fastbin chunks.
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 06:44:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: malloc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.26
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wangxuszcn at foxmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-25945-131-vtclgJxb1F@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-25945-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-25945-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 06:44:04 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25945

--- Comment #11 from wangxu <wangxuszcn at foxmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 12540
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D12540&action=3Ded=
it
patch2(tcache,fast,small,large,unsorted) and bench-malloc-xxx test result

(In reply to wangxu from comment #10)
> Created attachment 12538 [details]
> patch and bench-malloc-xxx test result
>=20
> Hi Carlos
>   Sorry for late reply.
>   I just clear other pointer from tcache and fastbin(without small,large).
>=20
> 1. bench-malloc-simple-[8-64] looks like better performance than before.
> 2. bench-malloc-simple-[128-4096] and bench-malloc-thread-xx are almost t=
he
> same.
>=20
> Attachment is the results of two rounds testing of bench-malloc-simple and
> bench-malloc-thread.

Hi Carlos

If clear pointer from tcache,fast-small-large-unsorted bin.
1. bench-malloc-simple-[8-64] look better than before.
2. bench-malloc-simple-[128-1024] are almost the same.
3. bench-malloc-simple-[2048-4096] are slightly bad.
3. bench-malloc-thread-[6-32] need more than about 10% max_rss than before.
Attachment file is "patch2(tcache,fast,small,large,unsorted) and
bench-malloc-xxx test result.zip"

Taking into account the severity of the issue, the performance of the two
patches, I suggest consider only tcache and fastbin.

Thanks for any other suggestions.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=