From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E004E398545E; Fri, 29 May 2020 19:40:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E004E398545E From: "mark at klomp dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/26022] valgrind gives me error when fwprintf in stderr Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 19:40:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.27 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mark at klomp dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 19:40:28 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26022 Mark Wielaard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |mark at klomp dot org Resolution|INVALID |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-29 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #1) > I've filed a Valgrind bug here: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D421931 >=20 > Please feel free to follow up there if you think it needs an update or you > want to give a +1 regarding your use case. >=20 > I'm marking this RESOLVED/INVALID for glibc. As discussed in that bug, lets reconsider if this is something that can be cleaned up or clarified in glibc. valgrind itself doesn't use streams, or e= ven link against glibc itself. When valgrind "calls" __libc_freeres the user process as already exitted, no other code/threads that could call into glibc will run during or after the call to __libc_freeres. Are there any other us= ers of __libc_freeres that might not make those guarantees? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=