From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1367E388F043; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:36:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1367E388F043
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/26124] Export <cpu-features.h>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:36:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.32
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-26124-131-qr5wkY63Ya@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26124-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26124-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:36:42 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26124

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> GCC already has this as __builtin_cpu_supports. Why isn't that sufficient?
>=20
> GCC support is desirable so that GCC can turn the expression into a true
> value at compile time if the CPU feature is required by the current
> compilation environment.

__builtin_cpu_supports only supports a subset of <cpu-features.h>.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=