From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 684793851C33; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 18:04:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 684793851C33 From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/26209] Compiling Glibc-2.11.1 on Raspberrypi4 fails as config.guess returns armv7l unknown Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 18:04:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.11 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 18:04:05 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26209 Adhemerval Zanella changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adhemerval.zanella at lina= ro dot o | |rg --- Comment #3 from Adhemerval Zanella --- (In reply to Rob Hookham from comment #2) > (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > > Before 2.17, armv7l was part of the ports repository. >=20 > I am not sure I understand, are you telling me that I cannot compile this= if > I specify a Kernel below 2.17 ?=20 >=20 > If so as I am trying to fix an embedded linux system that has no compiler > and has glibc 2.11.1 that is damaged. (It does howver have a compatible a= rm > processor.) >=20 > I thought that if I compile for a later kernel will it will be rejected by > the embedded system. >=20 > Maybe I am misssing something simple here ? > Rgaqrds > Rob What Andreas noted is arm used to be part of glibc-ports [1] before its inclusing on generic tree on glibc 2.17. The ports used be a add-on on gli= bc, so you need to check out this on the glibc tree and use the --enable-add-on= s to enable it. [1] git://sourceware.org/git/glibc-ports.git --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=