public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hkrawbytes at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug malloc/26306] New: Confusion in malloc.c  about the fastbins size check.
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:19:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26306-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26306

            Bug ID: 26306
           Summary: Confusion in malloc.c  about the fastbins size check.
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: malloc
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: hkrawbytes at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 12728
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12728&action=edit
poc

It looks like there's some confusion in malloc.c as to whether the fastbin
index should be treated as an int or a long int during the fastbin size
integrity check. The fastbin_idx macro casts the chunk size field down to an
unsigned int, which is then confusingly stored as a long int for use in the
integrity check.
And it presents in the latest glibc versions and also in old one's.
The result is that, the fastbin size integrity check only applies to the 4
least-significant bytes of the size field.

Here's the POC.

```
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<string.h>

int main()
{
        char *i[7];
        char *j;
        int s;
        char *k[7];     
        char *b;
        for(s = 0;s<7;s++) {
                i[s] = (char *) malloc(0x10);
        }
        j = (char *) malloc(0x10);
        for(s=0;s<7;s++) {
                free(i[s]);
        }
        free(j);
        memcpy((j - 0x8),"\x21\x00\x00\x00\x61\x61\x61\x61", 8);                
        for(s=0;s<7;s++) {
                k[s] = (char *) malloc(0x10);
        }
        b = (char *) malloc(0x10);


}
```
The fastbin size integrity check should check for the whole qword right?.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28  7:19 hkrawbytes at gmail dot com [this message]
2020-07-28  9:53 ` [Bug malloc/26306] " fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-07-28 10:07 ` hkrawbytes at gmail dot com
2020-07-28 10:08 ` hkrawbytes at gmail dot com
2020-07-31 10:01 ` fweimer at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-26306-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).