From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1C1F8398547B; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:38:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1C1F8398547B
From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/26371] [RFE] please add clone3() wrapper (in particular
 the CLONE_INTO_CGROUP feature of it)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:38:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-26371-131-fRcjOzBmGH@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26371-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26371-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:38:33 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26371

--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Lennart Poettering from comment #3)
> vfork() would not really suffice. We do NSS stuff (getpwnam() and friends)
> in the child before we execve(), and that's blocking, but we really can't
> block PID 1. In fact we do various other blocking things too there, that =
we
> explicitly chose to do in the child so not to block PID 1.

Do you plan to make PID 1 multi-threaded at any point?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=