public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mztyvop at 0pointer dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/26371] New: [RFE] please add clone3() wrapper (in particular the CLONE_INTO_CGROUP feature of it)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:24:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26371-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26371

            Bug ID: 26371
           Summary: [RFE] please add clone3() wrapper (in particular the
                    CLONE_INTO_CGROUP feature of it)
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: mztyvop at 0pointer dot net
                CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

In systemd we'd really like to make use of the new CLONE_INTO_CGROUP kernel
feature available for clone3(). It would allows us removing some really ugly
code in systemd: right now whenever PID 1 forks off a service process we
manually migrate the process into the destination cgroup and we do this twice
(once from the parent/PID 1 and once from the child, since we need to be sure
the migration is complete before we continue in either). 

Unfortunately I don't see how we can properly make use of this in systemd,
without glibc providing some form of support for clone3() for us.

The problem is that if we issue clone3() with our own wrapper, glibc won't know
about the call. Then, when in the child we issue setgroups(), setuid() and so
on, the setxuid propagation stuff in glibc tries to propagate these credential
changes to other threads — threads that don't actually exist in the child...

Since issuing setuid() in some form is very typical during service invocation
this means this pretty systematically deadlocks if we use clone3(). And that
sucks.

I am not aware of any work-around for this: we cannot tell glibc that a
clone/fork has happened, we cannot tell glibc that all threads that existed in
the parent suddenly vanished. 

Hence, it would be great if glibc would gain a clone3() wrapper. Or
alternatively some way how we can turn off setxid propagation in the child? Or
some way to tell glibc that a clone/fork/clone3 happened and it should forget
about all its thread info?

Here's a systemd PR that implements things in systemd with a manual wrapper for
clone3(), and that then triggers the setxid deadlock as mentioned in the child:

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16706

Ideas, suggestions how to deal with this with current glibc would be very
welcome. I'd be quite sad if we'd have to wait for glibc() to wrap clone3()
natively to make use of this new concept.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-11 10:24 mztyvop at 0pointer dot net [this message]
2020-08-12 13:35 ` [Bug libc/26371] " christian.brauner at ubuntu dot com
2020-08-25 12:39 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-08-25 12:46 ` christian.brauner at ubuntu dot com
2020-08-25 14:57 ` mztyvop at 0pointer dot net
2020-08-25 15:07 ` mztyvop at 0pointer dot net
2020-08-25 15:12 ` mztyvop at 0pointer dot net
2020-09-21 11:38 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-21 12:37 ` mztyvop at 0pointer dot net
2020-09-22  9:45 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2021-06-29 22:40 ` crrodriguez at opensuse dot org
2023-06-01 12:53 ` bluca at debian dot org
2023-06-01 13:24 ` bluca at debian dot org
2023-06-01 18:46 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2023-06-02  0:58 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2023-06-26 11:48 ` bluca at debian dot org
2023-07-03 18:52 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-07-03 19:32 ` bluca at debian dot org
2023-09-05 16:11 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2023-09-05 16:20 ` bluca at debian dot org
2024-02-06 10:59 ` bluca at debian dot org
2024-02-06 12:38 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-26371-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).