From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AAAE23959E46; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:35:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AAAE23959E46
From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/26634] ld.so stats raw file names, bypassing the
 audit module
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:35:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.31
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-26634-131-Ii4ruut18n@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26634-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26634-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:35:12 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26634

--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Ludovic Court=C3=A8s from comment #3)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2)
> > Is there an actual bug here? The loader caches information that search =
path
> > entries do not exist. It is likely that this information will be useful=
 for
> > further library loading. So this does not even seem to be a performance=
 bug.
> >=20
> > Or is there an observable behavioral difference?
>=20
> Yes: when an audit module is used, the loader potentially stats the wrong
> directory (the "original" one instead of that returned by the audit modul=
e),
> and thus caches wrong information about search path entries.

Sorry, since the search path contains only the name without /PREFIX, probing
without /PREFIX seems like the right thing to do to me. What am I missing?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=