public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c @ 2020-10-26 16:04 max at maxfragg dot de 2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: max at maxfragg dot de @ 2020-10-26 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791 Bug ID: 26791 Summary: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c Product: glibc Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: libc Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: max at maxfragg dot de CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- if sysconf is used in multithreaded processes, various filedescriptors may leak due to missing O_CLOEXEC. Bug present in current head and at least all recent glibc-versions. diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c index 7958a74..783938a 100644 --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf.c @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ __sysconf (int name) if (procfname != NULL) { - int fd = __open_nocancel (procfname, O_RDONLY); + int fd = __open_nocancel (procfname, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC); if (fd != -1) { /* This is more than enough, the file contains a single integer. */ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c 2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de @ 2020-11-11 10:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791 Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC| |arjun.is at lostca dot se Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |arjun.is at lostca dot se Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> --- I'll apply, test and commit this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c 2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de 2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791 Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> --- Fixed: commit d2d714b9fc02e4710d6dc769d8ec2c9dab0eb69a Author: Maximilian Krüger <max@maxfragg.de> Date: Wed Nov 11 11:21:30 2020 +0100 Use O_CLOEXEC in sysconf [BZ #26791] If sysconf is used in multithreaded processes, various filedescriptors may leak due to missing O_CLOEXEC. This commit adds the flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c 2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de 2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791 --- Comment #3 from Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> --- Thanks for the report and patch! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/26791] Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c 2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: arjun.is at lostca dot se @ 2020-11-11 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26791 Arjun Shankar <arjun.is at lostca dot se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-11 12:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-10-26 16:04 [Bug libc/26791] New: Missing O_CLOEXEC in sysconf.c max at maxfragg dot de 2020-11-11 10:32 ` [Bug libc/26791] " arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:32 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:33 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se 2020-11-11 12:37 ` arjun.is at lostca dot se
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).