From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C228D3850438; Mon, 30 May 2022 15:25:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C228D3850438
From: "richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org"
 <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/28007] Add SPDX license identifiers
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 15:25:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28007-131-z5Tb7PmcMC@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28007-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28007-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 15:25:39 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28007

--- Comment #9 from richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #7)
> Carlos never should have suggested removing the FSF mandated license
> declarations.  That was not well thought out and is an unnecessary confus=
ion
> / distraction.
>=20
> Many security tools now are looking for SPDX license identifiers and the
> lack of the clear information in SPDX license identifier format is a grow=
ing
> inhibitor to GLIBC.

Just to be clear, I'm not saying they should be removed, I'm simply noting =
that
projects have taken different approaches and I'm asking which approach is
appropriate for glibc. If that is to add the identifier and leave everything
else, that is fine by me. I do have opinions on that but it isn't my place =
to
say in this case.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=