public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "patrick.mccarty at intel dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug locale/28199] New: iconvconfig prefix flag behaves differently in glibc 2.34
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 04:52:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28199-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28199

            Bug ID: 28199
           Summary: iconvconfig prefix flag behaves differently in glibc
                    2.34
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.34
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: locale
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: patrick.mccarty at intel dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Overview:
---------

In glibc 2.34, I observed that the gconv-modules cache created by `iconvconfig
--prefix=PATHPREFIX` contains a module lookup path with a prepended value of
PATHPREFIX. That is, the lookup path is "PATHPREFIX/LIBDIR/gconv-modules/".

However, in glibc 2.33 and earlier, the module lookup path from the cache
created by the same command does *not* contain that prepended value. Instead
the path is "LIBDIR/gconv-modules/".

I don't know if this is an expected change or a bug, but the distro I
contribute to (Clear Linux OS) relies on the behavior from glibc <= 2.33, since
the distro package re-creates the gconv module cache (with `iconvconfig
--prefix=%{buildroot}`) after the `make install`, running as a non-root user.
Thus, the expectation has been for the cache file to be pre-populated and not
created via %post scripts or equivalent mechanisms.


Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------

I tested on Clear Linux OS, comparing the results on release 34900 (with glibc
2.33) to 34930 (with glibc 2.34). But any equivalent setup to compare
`iconvconfig` behavior from glibc 2.33 to 2.34 will work.

1. Run the following series of commands (or equivalent). They assume the glibc
under test is installed system-wide and that the installation libdir is
/usr/lib64.

  $ mkdir -p /tmp/usr/lib64
  $ cp -a /usr/lib64/gconv /tmp/usr/lib64/
  $ rm -f /tmp/usr/lib64/gconv/gconv-modules.cache
  $ iconvconfig --prefix=/tmp -o foo
  $ strings foo | grep /usr/lib64/gconv


Actual Results:
---------------

The grep command prints `/tmp/usr/lib64/gconv/`, demonstrating that the path
prefix, `/tmp`, is prepended to the cache lookup path. 


Expected Results:
-----------------

The grep command prints `/usr/lib64/gconv/`, demonstrating that the path prefix
is omitted from the lookup path. This is the behavior in glibc <= 2.33.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06  4:52 patrick.mccarty at intel dot com [this message]
2021-08-08 11:51 ` [Bug locale/28199] " michael.hudson at canonical dot com
2021-08-08 11:58 ` michael.hudson at canonical dot com
2021-08-08 12:02 ` michael.hudson at canonical dot com
2021-08-08 18:44 ` siddhesh at sourceware dot org
2021-08-08 21:21 ` michael.hudson at canonical dot com
2021-09-13 15:23 ` siddhesh at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-28199-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).