From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AECC73858436; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:04:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AECC73858436 From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/28499] Couldn't export variable to sub process Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:04:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.32 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: NOTABUG X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:04:32 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28499 Adhemerval Zanella changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Adhemerval Zanella --- (In reply to Vignesh from comment #2) > Hi, >=20 > Thanks for the reply,=20 >=20 > That works for me too if my binutils version is 2.27 or above >=20 > if the binutils is less than 2.27 I am facing the issue. >=20 > I kept the binutils 2.25.1 as default and just changed glibc from 2.31 to > 2.32. > 2.31 works and 2.32 doesn't. >=20 > binutils 2.27 is released around 2016 and I hope there should me some > modification made in the glibc from 2.31 to 2.32 on top of that. It really hard to debug such issue without a way to reproduce it so we can isolate the issue to an specific component. You might want to debug with either strace or gdb if the environment variab= les are passed. Meanwhile I will close it since it does not seems to be a glibc specific is= sue. If you a reproducer, please reopen it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=