From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C87EE385BF84; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 20:04:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C87EE385BF84
From: "goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/28572] Misaligned accesses in test-memcpy and test-mempcpy
 on hppa
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 20:04:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28572-131-aXsORSTleo@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28572-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28572-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 20:04:22 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28572

--- Comment #11 from Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> (In reply to Noah Goldstein from comment #9)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> > > memcpy should work on unaligned addresses.  Also we need to increase
> > > TIMEOUT for memcpy.
> >=20
> > It does "work" still. But if it takes 400+ minutes its not really a use=
ful
> > test.
> >=20
> > I think these tests are important for x86 but if the burden on other ta=
rgets
> > is too high it doesn't seem reasonable to have them in `string/`
>=20
> Are they for performance or correctness?

Correctness.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=