From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4D2793858D20; Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:11:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4D2793858D20
From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org"
 <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/28857] FAIL: elf/tst-audit24a
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 12:11:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.35
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28857-131-TEYGKz81LK@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28857-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28857-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 12:11:36 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28857

--- Comment #6 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot or=
g> ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #5)
> Created attachment 13960 [details]
> libc_28857-v2.d
>=20
> On 2022-02-04 1:53 p.m., adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org wrote:
> > The _dl_lookup_address seems to be indeed required and I also think we =
should
> > only updated the binding if la_symbind actually acts uppon it.  The fol=
lowing
> > patch fixes the tests on hppa:
> Attached is an updated patch.=C2=A0 The change to DL_FIXUP_BINDNOW_RELOC =
was not
> correct.
> As far as I can tell, it is not necessary to call _dl_lookup_address.=C2=
=A0 But
> we do need to clear the
> plabel bit from new_value or st_value.=C2=A0 I think the same issue could=
 also
> potentially occur with
> DL_FIXUP_ADDR_VALUE.
>=20
> I also hacked things a bit to fix warning from dl-fptr.c.
>=20
> I'm still not sure where the nameless R_PARISC_IPLT relocation comes from.

I will update the patch by just masking off the plabel bit as you suggested=
. I
am not sure about DL_FIXUP_ADDR_VALUE change since it is unrelated to this
issue, but it does seem reasonable.

The dl-fptr.c warning fixes I would prefer to send in a different path.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=