From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 41D033858D28; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:29:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 41D033858D28
From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/28937] New DSO dependency resolver buggyness with
 dlclose()
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:29:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.35
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28937-131-Eb2XXCfWlZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28937-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28937-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:29:24 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28937

--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Ben Woodard from comment #5)
> Created attachment 14059 [details]
> possible reproducer
>=20
> I'm pretty sure that this reproducer is manifesting the same problem. So =
far
> we have observed this with the debian beta and with fedora 36 beta both of
> which use glibc 2.35

Thank you for helping with this bug. However, this reproducer is something
else: it's an incorrect putenv call with a static string argument in hwloc.=
 So
it's not a glibc bug.

(Note that the reproducer needs to be linked with -Wl,--no-as-needed in case
the link editor defaults to as-needed mode.)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=