From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 40B5C3856082; Wed, 25 May 2022 12:41:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40B5C3856082
From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org"
 <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/29165] [Regression] broken argv adjustment
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 12:41:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.36
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29165-131-2f7qODeRhB@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29165-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29165-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 12:41:31 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29165

--- Comment #5 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot or=
g> ---
But the start above will tail call _dl_start and _dl_start will call the us=
er
entrypoint that will eventually calls exit syscall.  So I can't see why mat=
ter
restore r24 and r25 at this point, specially since they will point to the l=
d.so
ones.

(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #4)
> But the comment says these are for (_start) in start.S.
>=20
> On 2022-05-25 7:57 a.m., adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org wrote:
> > I don't think it is required since _dl_fini does not have any arguments.
> >
> > (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #2)
> >> Thanks.=C2=A0 I think we need to keep the instructions that save and r=
estore r24
> >> and r25.
> >> They will be clobbered by call to _dl_init.
> >>
> >> Will test.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=