public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/29313] MIN/MAX macros can cause double evaluation of arguments
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 17:00:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29313-131-dfo2pkKQTo@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29313-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29313

Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com

--- Comment #3 from Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Vasilis Gkoumplias from comment #0)
> * MIN, MAX macros as defined in misc/sys/param.h
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=misc/sys/param.h;
> hb=HEAD
> can cause the double evaluation of one of the passed in arguments.
> Currently MAX is defined as:
> #define MAX(a,b) (((a)>(b))?(a):(b))
> This will evaluate the maximum argument twice.
> 
> * A test case to reproduce this would go like this:
> int a = 1000;
> int b = 10;
> MAX(a++, b++) ;
> // This will fail as a will be 1002 due to double evaluation by the MAX macro
> EXPECT_EQ(a, 1001)
> 
> * solution
> #define max(a,b) \
>    ({ __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); \
>        __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); \
>      _a > _b ? _a : _b; })
> 
> * A discussion (and a solution) for the matter can be found here
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3437404/min-and-max-in-c
> 
I don't think we can change the existing macros to that because
they will no longer be usable outside of functions.

#define MAX(x, y) ((x) > (y) ? (x) : (y))

#define max(a, b)                                                             
\
    ({                                                                        
\
        __typeof__(a) _a = (a);                                               
\
        __typeof__(b) _b = (b);                                               
\
        _a > _b ? _a : _b;                                                    
\
    })


enum { A = 1, B = 2 };

// Okay
enum { C = MAX(A, B) };

// Compile error
enum { D = max(A, B) };


> 
> Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-01 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-01 11:13 [Bug libc/29313] New: " gkoumplias at gmail dot com
2022-07-01 12:21 ` [Bug libc/29313] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2022-07-01 12:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-07-01 17:00 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-29313-131-dfo2pkKQTo@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).