public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "siddhesh at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug string/29452] /home/dave/gnu/glibc/glibc/debug/../string/bits/string_fortified.h:30: undefined reference to `__builtin_dynamic_object_size'
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 16:19:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29452-131-l0CXSBBSvp@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29452-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29452
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |siddhesh at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #4 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3)
> Shouldn't the prereq for __builtin_dynamic_object_size be GCC 12.1 instead
> of 12.0?
>
> There's no 12.0 release and the feature was added during the development
> phase for the
> first GCC 12 release.
AFAICT, except for one instance (in a test not in any headers), version checks
against the first major release always refer to the .0 version number. I guess
this is to make the feature testable during development (where one simply
rebases to the latest gcc development snapshot) so that it remains unchanged in
glibc even after release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-06 14:41 [Bug string/29452] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-07 8:43 ` [Bug string/29452] " fweimer at redhat dot com
2022-08-07 15:07 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2022-08-08 16:11 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2022-08-08 16:19 ` siddhesh at sourceware dot org [this message]
2023-07-07 15:03 ` fernando.hueso at uv dot es
2023-07-07 15:08 ` siddhesh at sourceware dot org
2023-07-07 15:41 ` fernando.hueso at uv dot es
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-29452-131-l0CXSBBSvp@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).