From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7B98A3858020; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:40:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7B98A3858020 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1691768434; bh=0ATQboijN43JLbY1uMilpLtqohBfCBUYgCVY2XpqcNo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XrSJlnm2yacykIf4ItP2OCzPE94Bf6gUu+lspJQ2Yqg27BOWgjCpPc/gnCZgusHzR i6I8fFLairam5ttY3OLA+hlO9rEXzu014VPaxiGCuGmT6+YlBWiO+WUTFdYmmlVOFW A8X2r4+j5gVYO4A6vA+a2vLtuDw3urOmP3nr+NQ4= From: "es20490446e at gmail dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug build/29456] missing DT_HASH section in shared objects Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:40:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: build X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.36 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: es20490446e at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29456 Alberto Salvia Novella changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |es20490446e at gmail dot c= om --- Comment #21 from Alberto Salvia Novella = --- You are overlooking the main point boyos. People MUST be able to tell, in advance, that the ABI will be missing a previous component. The simple way to do that is just to increment the soname. If you can't do that, you MUST not reduce the ABI. You cannot rely on a component just not being used anymore, announcing the change in a blog, or even documenting it. The change needs to be explicit while compiling. Any other thing is a leap = of faith into the void. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=